Links roundup

I should do this more often.

From Marlene Perez’s blog (

):

On Monday, I volunteered at the Scholastic book fair, where I sold several copies of 

 CONFESSIONS OF A CLOSET CATHOLIC. I also convinced myself to buy a stack of books that I’m pretty sure I don’t absolutely need. Wanna hear the top question asked at the book fair? It was–Got any books about dragons?

(We do! We do!)

Question: in your own trend-watching, do you find that people are looking for dragon books? 

Also, two children’s lit bloggers interview each other. The one I find most interesting because, as interviewer Andrew Carre says, we don’t hear from independent buyers often, is the one of Jennifer Laughran (

), a buyer for Books, Inc in San Francisco and the one in charge of Not Your Mother’s Book Club.


I especially like her point that “
Yep, covers are important, but not as much as numbers for the authors’ previous books, the reputation of the imprint, the production style, the retail price, etc. The thing that is probably the most important, though, is the sales rep’s faith in the book … and really, how much we trust the rep.”

The chains obviously look at all those other things too–price and style are important to them as much as covers, I’m sure–but I’m sure we’ve all heard how they also care a lot about the covers. And covers are important! I love covers. It’s just interesting to see the different perspectives between independent buyers–who serve a much more specific market and can tailor their buying accordingly–and buyers who deal with such large numbers that they have to think on more general terms across the country.

Also, she talks about how she has to figure out if she can personally convince the individual salespeople in the store branches to handsell, and whether it’s worth it for each book. Interesting stuff. I worked as a children’s bookseller in a B&N back in grad school and did a lot of handselling because I knew children’s books, but I’ve always felt it to be more personal in an independent–I loved dropping into the Children’s Book Shop down the street from my apartment in Brookline, MA, not only to talk to a former Simmons classmate who worked there, but also to hear the booksellers’ opinions on new books. It also helped tha
t they were nice enough to give Simmons students a discount, but I would have made it a point to buy from them as often as possible anyway.

 
Then in turn she interviews Andrew Carre in his persona as YA editor at Flux, the new Llewellyn imprint.

Objects of my profession

I brought the new toy to work. 😀

Pictures behind the cut. There’s no real guessing involved–I’m sure you can figure out what the objects are–but I thought you’d get a kick out of them. One of the objects is from

. Can you guess which one? 


Oh, and I couldn’t resist sharing my two favorite recent cat photos. 

Tildrum:

…and Mogget:

How do you choose a book?

Is the book review section of the newspaper relevant to you? asks MediaBistro’s GalleyCat. And they’d like your feedback–the feedback of regular people who read, rather than just industry insiders.

So pop on over and take the quiz, whether you read the newspaper or not. 

For me, I wish it gave you the choice for several options, rather than just one. I use blogs, personal recommendations, what jumps out at me on the shelves, reviews in journals such as SLJ, VOYA, or the Horn Book–all those except the newspaper review section. Hm…

I’m bawling here, people!

I’ve decided that today is my running commentary blog day. 
I just have to say out loud that Extreme Makeover: Home Edition always makes me cry. They do good things for people who need it. I’ve had my concerns in the past about the supersizing of small homes–tax burdens on poor families, utility burdens, that kind of thing–but the direction they’ve been taking, making sure to build more “greener” when they can, looking for people who don’t just have small or worn-down houses but who have something very special about them who can’t do for themselves what needs to be done. I’ve seen them help two families whose houses burned down–tonight’s is making me bawl because not only did their house burn down, but then the oldest son died in a car accident not much later–I’ve seen them help families with foster children with special needs (AIDS and such), and so on and on. If you watch the show you know what I’m talking about.
Sigh. So sad and so lovely all at once.
I must say, I still have my reservations because problems aren’t solved by making your material dreams come true, whatever they are (though I’d love them to come in and pay off my student loans, don’t get me wrong!)–but when you’re at a point in your life where you don’t even have a place to live, or that place to live is slowly killing you (in the case of the moldy house with the special needs foster kids), when you can’t make those ends meet, it’s really hard to work out your other problems, and a little joy like this for these people brings hope they might not have otherwise had. So, kudos for them, and kudos for them to spread the trend by encouraging people to get involved in their own communities. As I’ve watched the show, there have been so many times the community has gotten together to pay off a mortgage or set aside a fund for utilities or get the funds together for whatever special need the family has, and that’s really nice.

JacketFlap

I haven’t been over to JacketFlap for a while, simply out of negligence, which means that recently that when I figured out how to do buttons on my sidebar I forgot to add this one:
Add This Blog to My JacketFlap Blog Reader
… (well, one similar to it) which you should see now over there on the right. Especially if you don’t already do the LJ friends-list thing, JacketFlap is a great way to aggregate your children’s publishing related blogs all in one spot–blogger, LJ, all of them.
In their own words, “JacketFlap has become the world’s largest and most comprehensive resource for information on the children’s book industry. Writers, illustrators, librarians, agents, editors, publicists, and publishers visit JacketFlap every day. JacketFlap is one of the best resources available for getting your blog in front of the right people.”
My blog reading is usually just reading my friends page here on LJ, because it’s the easy way to do it for what I know how to do, but Tracy and the JacketFlap people have really been doing a great job in creating interesting content and figuring out all the good blogs and getting them all in one place–another reason I haven’t been over there, because I know if I add all the interesting blogs to my reader I’ll spend all my time over there!
So anyway, if you don’t know what JacketFlap is, check out the link. If you’re a children’s or YA author and your blog isn’t listed, check with the JacketFlap people about how to go about doing that.
Now I’m going to go figure out all the blogs they’ve added since I last browsed…

Recent visitors shout out

I must say, there was a reason I loved Romper Room as a kid. I waited and waited, and she never did say she saw Stacy. But I had hope every time.

So if you’ve been reading this LJ for a while, you know how facinated I am to connect with people all over the world. Well, the next best thing is to connect with people from home. Or is it the other way around? All I know is, I’ve had a recent visitor from Champaign-Urbana, Illinois, and I must say hello, because how could I ignore my alma mater? (Sort of. I spent 4 1/2 years there but ended up graduating from BYU.)

So to you fellow Illinoisans out there, welcome! (Even if you’re not an 8th-generation one like me. 😀 Which of course my being in Seattle makes many a farm-bred relative ask, “What do you need to be all the way out there again for, anyway?” To which I point to my old friend from my Galva High School class who lives in Tacoma and say, “It’s not just me!” Which reminds me that spring is coming and I need to make a field trip to the Tacoma Museum of Glass. Can you believe I’ve lived here nearly two years and never taken my high school friend who works there up on the offer to see it??? I can’t.)

Off to read a book, and I’m not sure whether I want to go blast the Marching Illini to embrace “Alma Mater” going through my head (yes, I played mello and LOVED being in the band that Sousa loved) or go find something to take the nostalgia away.

FAQ: Take Joy, a review (sort of)

I think it appropriate that the book I will review today will be Jane  Yolen’s Take Joy, due to all the joy I’ve been taking in my new camera over the weekend. I’ve been finding the joy again in my photography that I’ve been delaying for so long because film has become such an encumbrance that I end up saving rolls of film for months–my latest batch included shots from San Diego Comic-Con last July, a trip I took last August, several rolls from my Christmas travels, as well as a variety of smaller events in the last six months–and by the time I get to see them again, the pictures have little meaning. I didn’t play with pictures as much as I used to when in photography classes because I don’t have the time to play in the darkroom making the exposure perfect (though how tempting it has been over the years to find a place I can build a darkroom, especially this last year because my uncle offered me his enlarger….).

Getting the digital camera, even in the first few days of use, has given me back that joy. I’m starting to remember the way I used to play with angles and ligh
ting and the strange subjects I used to seek out. I have done a little of that playing with my camera phone, but that’s more of a toy than a passion–when you’re dealing with a 2 MP camera, there’s only so much art you can create.

(I have a point, really I do.)

This is an important process to me, because I occasionally do a freelance article here and there, a wedding here and there, that kind of thing. I’m taking some pictures for our kickboxing teacher in a couple weeks to help him promote his new dojo. But I’d been feeling lately that I was losinig my chops. All my pictures ended up coming out the same–lots of flash burn, standard compositions, nothing out of the ordinary that gives you that wow factor. Competent, but not excellent. Even the pictures I posted in the last few days reflect those ways of seeing, though I love the salt shaker post because it’s something different, something new I tried after learning a few things about indoor lighting (the bane of my photographic existence).

So, what does this have to do with writing and with Jane Yolen’s book in particular?

The whole book is about that discovery process, giving writers permission to find that joy that I have been rediscovering in my photography. In the first chapter Yolen quotes Gene Fowler, “‘Writing is easy: All you do is sit staring at a blank sheet of paper until the drops of blood form on your forehead'” and immediately refutes him: “I suggest you learn to write not with blood and fear, but with joy.” She says to forget about publishing, because it’s out of your hands, and to focus on the joy of your craft–of writing a story well, of really digging in and living in the story.

A very good premise. I mean, after all, why write if you don’t find joy in it? I write. I think I’ve said it before here. I have a story, a retelling of a Scottish fairy tale, that I’ve been working on since my last year at BYU, in 2001. It’s gone through many renditions, and the most I’ve ever finished was a novellette for a folklore class in grad school. Then I threw out the entire setting and decided to change it all around, and have gotten all of 10,000 words written since then in the new setting.

Why haven’t I finished it? Because while it brings me joy to live in that story, it doesn’t bring me enough joy to make it worth my time to write every night after doing a very similar activity at work every day. I fully admit I may never be a published fiction writer (I am a published non-fiction freelance writer over and over, but that’s a different market), and that’s enough for me to find the little joys in the little bits of writing I do from time to time because publication isn’t important to me–what’s important to me is the story in my imagination.

And mostly because I find that same kind of joy in being an editor to far better books than I could probably write right now.

For those who don’t have that push-pull of using up that creative energy before you can set pen to paper (metaphorically speaking), Yolen’s book will have much fodder for the imagination.

Though I must say that the whole numinous “the mystery of fiction,” “the mystery of the writing process,” bleh. Don’t make it all mysterious, as if someone with a little talent and a lot of effort can’t figure it out. There’s nothing mysterious about the combination of putting in the time to do something you love so that you can develop the inborn talent you have into something better. It’s work, but if you find joy in it, it’s time well spent, in my opinion.

But that may just be my practical Midwestern upbringing coming into play. Doesn’t mean that there isn’t mystery in the art, and if that motivates you to seek joy in creating art, whatever your art is, more power to you.

Back to Take Joy–as you have probably already guessed, this isn’t so much a review as a disjointed essay borne from a few ideas I’ve plucked from its pages–Yolen says
that “These stories grace our actual lives with their fictional realities. Like angels they lift us above the hurrying world.” I really like that idea. I don’t know if I can recapture what it is that caught me about that particular passage, but I’ll try.

As I was driving home the other night a program on NPR caught my attention. It was a Romanian professor by the name of Kodrescu (spelling? who knows?) who was speaking about the power of memories, how we create memories that didn’t actually happen and turn them to pedagogical uses, how we change memory to fantasy because sometimes fantasy feels more real than the reality it is trying to reflect.

How to express this? That talk really said something to me the other night, but now it’s slipping from my mind, and I can barely even remember who the speaker was at this point.

At any rate, I think what I’m trying to say is that sometimes in fiction we find more truth than we do in the reality we’re seeking to interpret. I’ve said this before about fantasy, about its wonderful metaphorical magic. We can talk about struggles, the epic battle between good and evil, the shades of gray, the variety of human existence, in so many ways in fantasy that we can’t do as well in realism sometimes because of the power the metaphor gives us–the power that the fictional, the fantasy (meaning the numinous, the fantastic, as well as simply the fantasy of making up a story), give us to assign multiple meanings and to interpret and reinterpret.

That the stories can “grace our actual lives with their fictional realities” can mean so many things, and I’m losing the ability to express what I’m trying to say.

At any rate, the book is a good read, and I think nonwriters as well as writers can benefit from the idea of taking joy in the art you pursue–remembering why you do what you do.

Of course, writers will get even more out of it, because she’s got some solid advice for writers in there about taking rejection well, the elements of a good story (beyond a simple anecdote to a fully drawn drama), finding your voice, even a whole section dedicated to specific practical advice. I love the little interludes, the little bits of wisdom between chapters. One such, before chapter 5, is especially apropos for anyone who writes historical fiction, fantasy, or other genres that require lots of research:

For a writer, nothing is lost. Research once done can be used again and again, a kind of marvel of recycling. As writers we need to be shameless about thieving from ourselves.

For example, I did two books on the Shakers–a nonfiction book called Simple Gifts and a novel, %3
Cem>The Gift of Sarah Barker. And it is no coincidence that the round barn I discovered in my historical research, I then used as a piece of setting in the Sarah Barker book. It later found its way into my young adult science fiction novel, Dragon’s Blood.

Good research swims upstream where it can spawn. (p. 41)

So there you have it, as one of hopefully a lot of writing book recommendations here at Stacy Whitman’s Grimoire, couched in an essay on finding my photography chops again. Check out the book–you might find some gems that help you find joy in your own writing.

And still nothing to do with editing

I promise, as soon as I get Heroes started (after this post), I’ll write that post I promised on Take Joy, which is sitting right here next to me. But first, since you all enjoyed spring so much, a sample of the joy that is my telephoto macro lens on my new camera body. 

Study of a salt shaker

Playing with my new digital camera. These are going for a little more of the light study thing, along with using the two different lenses, the macro, that sort of thing. Originals here.





I think this next one is my favorite because of the detail you can see in the salt crystals, on the lower right.



What do you think?